| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. EVE Online: Revolution (0.0 THEME FOR WINTER EXPANSION) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
You mean they aren't two sockpuppets the CSM/nullsec entities have created to try and give the illusion of 'choice' and 'dicussion'? You're breaking my mind Scatim.
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2013.08.06 11:58:00
|
2. WTA Utu - in Sell Orders [original thread]
46B
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2013.07.28 21:12:00
|
3. time for change - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vimsy Vortis wrote: Maybe if there were more ways to lawfully engage freighters in combat in highsec people wouldn't gank them so much. Freighter duel at the sun?
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.09.29 15:33:00
|
4. time for change - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
White Tree wrote: ISD Praetoxx wrote: /thread Get back to Reddit. We are legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us. 9gag army.
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.09.29 15:29:00
|
5. Absurd Gallente Logistics Station Ring Rotation Speed and Breach of Physics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Astald Ohtar wrote: And accelerating to 3 AUs? how much G is that? None. We aren't accelerating, we're accelerating the local spacetime fabric to facilitate 'movement'.
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.08.02 12:12:00
|
6. Goons 4x4ing through the Sandbox - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
1. Players consider way to use in game mechanics to recieve ISKies for their toonies. 2. They figure out formulas for the ISK value of items and their respective LP costs. 3. Players use market manipulation (Something continually done in Jita and ...
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.06.21 18:43:00
|
7. -A- Scams Recruits, Members - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Richter Enderas wrote: -A- is a garbage alliance filled with arrogant idiots, incompetent tryhards and washed-up ex Morsus Mihi morons striving for the good ol' days (where they got rich by knifing the kidneys of the person closest to them and ...
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.06.20 20:47:00
|
8. BAN ******** CORPORATION AND ALLIANCE NAMES - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
We should name ourselves: "Mystic Capsuleers" "Knights of Excellence" "Praetorian Knights" "Kingdoms of Old" "Rocketeers" "Weyland Enterprises" "Exploration Holders" "Jimmy Rustles"
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.06.10 10:21:00
|
9. Sticky:New dev blog: DirectX 11 Tessellation Tech Demo at Fanfest 2012 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Any chance of getting this released as a stand alone tech demo that we can all have a look at? Would be interesting to see how my PC copes with such sexyness. Please? :3
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.03.27 14:27:00
|
10. Dovinian for CSM7 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Beffah wrote: let me to ~frivolous~ things to you~ Just in case you go and edit things.
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.02.17 22:56:00
|
11. The Mittani, CSM7 Chairman: Our work is not yet done. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
As you mentioned, the other types of EW frigates are pretty bad and need a rework. Perhaps that is a push change for another expansion labelled "Warfare". Not sure what the change would be, in all honesty. A flat change to how much the modules ...
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.02.17 22:47:00
|
12. The Mittani, CSM7 Chairman: Our work is not yet done. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
ECM don't need a nerf, it needs a reboot. ECM frigates need a use beyond gimmick/frigate roams.
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.02.17 22:32:00
|
13. Dovinian for CSM7 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Last night I bought a fur coat on the way back home, I didn't bother checking how much it was I just threw a pile of cash at the cashier. I'm so god-damn frivolous.
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.02.17 22:29:00
|
14. The Mittani, CSM7 Chairman: Our work is not yet done. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
You guys are getting way off topic.
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.02.17 22:27:00
|
15. The Mittani, CSM7 Chairman: Our work is not yet done. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
It's simple. The Methnaught becomes a low-sec cap ship and booster production can only occur in low-sec, that way the amount it costs to make stays roughly the same. Low-sec gets a cool way of making money and the methnaught becomes a reality. Yo...
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.02.17 18:15:00
|
16. The Mittani, CSM7 Chairman: Our work is not yet done. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I vote the methnaught have a new gang warfare link that allows a booster effect to be partially applied to the whole fleet for the duration, this would be in addition to the boosters used by any of the fleet users. This would require a new siege ...
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.02.17 15:53:00
|
17. The Mittani, CSM7 Chairman: Our work is not yet done. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Seleene wrote: better and OMG METH-NAUGHTS (drug lab cap ships) Seleene wrote: OMG METH-NAUGHTS Seleene wrote: Methnaught http://www.myfacewhen.net/uploads/1912-so-much-win.jpg
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.02.17 10:18:00
|
18. The Mittani, CSM7 Chairman: Our work is not yet done. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
If you vote for me in CSM 8, I will push for virtual hats to be added to the game in conjunction with a valve TF2 EVE hat release. I want an avatar to dangle from the top of my head.
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.02.16 15:48:00
|
19. Official Protest - Mittani should be removed from CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
That's kind of a weird argument. Yes, I can see that these changes would impact in some way onto a null-sec alliance. Out of a list of 50 other changes that affect other parts of the game and other people. I can go down the list and give you the o...
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.02.16 15:12:00
|
20. Democracy does not work. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I agree with an active abstain, it would be interesting to see by what % voting participation goes up if this were to go in. It's a good metric for CCP as well.
- by Boris Lachenkov - at 2012.02.16 14:26:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |